Great Britain
What is your site’s flexibility worth?
Pick the site closest to yours. You get a figure and a full breakdown of where it comes from, built from primary market and regulator data, with every rate sourced and dated.
Which of these is closest to your site?
Every option is a real customer shape with typical equipment and typical energy for that kind of site. Nothing here is tuned to flatter. Pick one, then adjust the two or three things that actually move the number.
Choose a site above and the figure, the breakdown and the sources appear here.
Net recurring value, GBP per year
Calculating per year, after deductions
Composition of the gross recurring value.
Adjust it to your site
These are the controls that materially change this kind of site’s answer. Everything else, including the market, the asset list and every assumption, is in the detail sections below and can all be overridden.
Where the money comes from
Each line is a separate way this site earns or saves. Market revenue and bill savings are never mixed together.
Priced, and not counted, because we cannot open these routes for you yet
These markets pay real money for a site like yours. AmpVerve does not yet hold the registration, qualification or contract that each one requires, so none of it is in the figure above. It is shown because you should be able to see the gap rather than discover it later.
What each asset contributes
Where this site’s defaults came from
Every starting value is a typical figure for this kind of site with the basis stated. If one of them is wrong for you, change it here or in the detail sections.
Illustrative screening estimate, not a quote, forecast or guarantee of revenue. Every figure is modelled, not measured. Revenue also depends on market access, qualification and metering that a given site may not have, so any route AmpVerve cannot open today is priced separately and excluded from the total. Figures hold availability, programme access and delivered performance to cautious assumptions, so the number survives a finance review. Actual results may be higher or lower after site-specific validation. Avoided network reinforcement is a one-time capital avoidance shown separately, outside the recurring total. Settlement, evidence and ESG reporting contribute no cash value.
Get the full breakdown as a PDF
The number above stays open to everyone. This is the working behind it.
The report carries the inputs you used, all three scenarios, every market route including the ones that pay nothing and the reason why, the source, evidence date and confidence grade behind each rate, the deductions in full, avoided network reinforcement kept separate as one-time capital avoidance, and the effect on total cost of ownership over a stated horizon.
Still a screening estimate, not a quote, a forecast or a guarantee of revenue.
The detail behind the number
Show the value line by line
Market revenue stays separate from tariff and peak savings. These lines sum exactly to the headline.
Fine-tune the assets behind this estimate
Rated kW is nameplate. The model converts it to deliverable capacity using a stated firmness factor per asset class.
Everything below takes its starting value from the site you picked. Override any of it if you know better. Changing something here keeps your edit: it is only reset when you pick a different site or press reset.
Compare all three scenarios
Each scenario changes named assumptions, not a percentage uplift. Selecting one changes the headline above.
Show the route by route breakdown, with every source and date
Every rate carries the body it came from and the date it was current. Routes that earn nothing are listed with the reason, rather than hidden.
Show what limits this result
Market floors, missing routes, structural ceilings and the registrations a route depends on.
How this is calculated
What this is. An illustrative screening estimate, not a quote, forecast or guarantee of revenue. Base Feasible and Advanced Managed use deliberately cautious assumptions. Exceptional Stack is not a typical annual outcome and requires validated programme access, asset compatibility and coexistence of value streams.
Cautious by design, for a reason. Figures intentionally exclude unconfirmed value streams and use cautious assumptions for availability, programme access and delivered performance. A number that fails a buyer's finance review is worth nothing in a procurement pack. Actual results may be higher or lower after site-specific validation.
Asset-class first. Value comes from the asset and its flexibility profile. Customer type sets the journey, the constraints and which routes apply. It does not replace the asset maths.
Deliverable capacity, not nameplate. Revenue is earned on the baseline delta a site can actually hold, after a firmness factor per asset class, and capped by the energy it can genuinely shift. No shiftable energy, no market revenue.
Availability. Taken from real hours. Five hours a week is credited as three percent of the year, not thirty two.
Categories are never mixed. Network charge reductions, tariff discounts and bill credits are savings, not revenue. Settlement, evidence and ESG reporting contribute no cash value. Avoided network reinforcement is a one-time capital avoidance shown separately, outside the recurring total.
Stacking. Availability products stack freely. Energy-delivery products compete for the same kWh in the same instant, so only the higher-value route earns on a given capacity.
Aggregation floors are binding. Where a market sets a minimum size, the calculator names the figure an aggregator must reach rather than quoting revenue a single small site could not earn.
Market access is separate from the market rate. A published rate is what a market pays a qualified participant. It is not what AmpVerve can route your asset into today. Any route that needs a registration, qualification or contract AmpVerve does not hold is priced, named and shown, and then excluded from the total. The current position for every route is in the market-access record published with the model.
Modelled, not measured. Every figure on this page is the output of a model run against published rates. None of it is a measurement of your site, and none of it is a record of what any AmpVerve customer was actually paid.
Unevidenced markets return nothing. There is no global fallback multiplier. No published, earnable route means zero, with an explanation.
Excluded. VAT, hardware, installation, metering and connection costs. Aggregator and market-access fees appear as an explicit deduction. Hardware payback is not modelled.
Sources. Every rate carries its primary body and date in the route list above, and in the published rate and assumption table.
Ask for a site-specific assessment
We backtest your half-hourly data against real prices.